|
February 10, 2010
Good to Great
February 2010 Hilton Strategic Plan Update
When I assumed the role of
Superintendent in 2005, I completed an Entry plan process to
gather information about the district so that my future
plans were based upon current reality and not on any
pre-conceived ideas I brought to the position. As a result
of this entry process, a District Strategic Plan was
developed in 2006 that reflected the philosophy and needs of
the schools and local community. During past three years
we have implemented the initial Strategic Plan and its
priority improvement areas to strengthen the organization
and build on past success. We have made meaningful gains
during this time period and have achieved some of the
identified goals. In order to move the District forward in
the next three years, it has been necessary for me to
reflect on my own work and the work of the District to
determine where we are and where we need to be headed in the
in the future. Following an examination of the District’s
current state, I have developed a new Strategic Plan as a
means to lead the District to new heights the next three
years. Working with the Board of Education in this endeavor,
we have finalized this process and the Board formally
approved the 2010 – 2013 Strategic Plan at their January 26
meeting. The new Strategic Plan Priority Improvement Areas
outlined graphically below reflects what we believe to be
the future needs and focus of the District. [Chart Below]
I will be attending staff meetings, parent and community
forums to provide more details about the plan in February
and March.
Strategic Plan
Framework 2010-13
2010 –
2011 Budget Update
Governor Patterson’s proposed state
budget that was unveiled in January has created one of the
most challenging budget seasons in decades. The proposed
state budget recommends the reduction of $3.2 million in
state aid to the Hilton Central School District; a 10% aid
reduction. The potential loss of state aid is twice the
amount proposed last year at this time. To put this into
perspective, if we roll over the current budget and include
anticipated increases in health care, retirement, BOCES and
contractual obligations and apply the proposed state aid
reduction, the result will be a 17.69% increase in the local
property tax rate. Clearly this is an unacceptable level
for the district and community to consider and cause for
concern. We have never experienced a reduction in state aid
of this magnitude. Following discussions with the Board of
Education, leadership team and bargaining unit leaders, we
have implemented a number of mid-year cuts in 2009-10 to
reduce our current level of spending and better prepare
ourselves for an uncertain future. As we look to 2010-11,
we again are examining all areas budgeted areas including
non-staff codes, personnel and programmatic expenditures in
an effort to reduce costs and develop a responsible school
budget. Our district budget committees, school leaders and
Board of Education are considering all options as we develop
next year’s budget that will be put before the voters on
Tuesday, May 18. If the governor’s proposed budget is
enacted or the state fails to approve an on-time budget by
April 1, this district will be forced to make some difficult
and painful decisions that will adversely impact employees,
the organization and our community. I have been addressing
staff at meetings recently to provide some details and
answer questions on the subject. If you have comments or
ideas on the district’s budget during the development phase,
I encourage you to contact me, Steve Ayers or a budget
committee representative. I also want to encourage every
employee to take responsibility for reducing costs or
increasing efficiency in your area of responsibility.
Sincerely, Dave
|